For several months this summer, I worked in the Uinta National Forest draining a swamp that was overflowing onto a nearby road and into the foundations of some cabins, including mine. After digging a 500 foot ditch through the swamp, I was able to channel most of the water away. However, whenever I left the swamp alone, it would slowly clog with enough debris that it would start to flood again. With a little perseverance, I continued to carve precautionary paths and outlets until the water could drain away with no effort on my part.
I could have given up half way through, and the swamp would have probably never risen enough to damage anything. However, the very process of channeling the flood eventually led to the discovery of several unclaimed freshwater springs. With a little more work, what was once a stinking bog became a crystal clear stream of potable water.
When beginning a project, I think the amount of work can sometimes feel like this overflowing swamp. For example, a project may be centered around solving problems that keep coming, lowering costs that keep rising, or saving time that can’t be saved. Whatever the circumstance, sometimes the only way to get things done is to jump waste-deep into the “swamp” and start going down the list of tasks. When a difficult project is effectively managed – channeled through the right paths per say – you may happen to find, as I did, the origins of the project’s source. At that point, problems are not only eliminated, but they transform into something that can be beneficial in the future.
All sorts of acronyms are associated with this idea; BPM (business process management) and PCM (project cycle management) seem to be the most common. However, rather than focusing on the details of these terms, I want to mention one fundamental principle that these practices suggest: namely that any recurring process in project management, if possible, ought to be automated. Basically, if there is a business critical tool that can eliminate the time it takes to create and send reports, then, if the tool proves to be beneficial, by all means use it. Each step toward automating a project process is like creating one more exit path out of a swamp. And, each exit path carved is one more path closer to the project source, which, in it’s ultimate end, is the constant flow of capital.

















